I cnduo't bvleiee taht I culod aulaclty uesdtannrd waht I was rdnaieg. Unisg the icndeblire pweor of the hmuan mnid, aocdcrnig to rseecrah at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mttaer in waht oderr the lterets in a wrod are, the olny irpoamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rhgit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whoutit a pboerlm. Tihs is bucseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey ltteer by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Aaznmig, huh? Yaeh and I awlyas tghhuot slelinpg was ipmorantt! See if yuor fdreins can raed tihs too.
That is very good Keith, the brain is a fantastic device, I must say though that I do prefer the simplicity of reading a well written piece it's just less work. Myself I have in the last few years developed several typing problems, I continually type "teh" instead of "the" and several other issues, these are clearly brain problems as I detect it almost immediately but cant stop what I am doing. I have even found myself writing words that were not my intended words but which in their own right made sense. Strange
The weird thing is, the original post was very easy to read - almost as easy as correct spellings. I suppose the first/last letter bit helps, although I didn't notice that was a stipulation at the start. Is it just English that this works with? Aolnls eftnans de la priaite :brit: