New Help need for my children

Well apart from the fact that your new approach to replying is to add comments to a quote, which makes the quote no longer a quote, the MN1 process can and will accept DNA evidence as part of the compelling evidence that the children are Kevin's children, ok, DNA evidence is compelling, the children are his.

This is the law (below), this is not PASSPORT law it is UK CITIZENSHIP law and that makes his kids British, same as my daughter is British, his only problem is proving this and DNA will do that.

https://www.gov.uk/apply-citizenship-british-parent/born-on-or-after-1-july-2006

Yes I realise that Kevin but it is a valid route to get them recognised.

edit: it is a valid route to get Charlotte recognised and is the correct way to get Charlotte recognised.

Ok I've checked Guide UKF (publishing.service.gov.uk) and that does specify that a DNA test would be acceptable.

This form did not exist back when I applied so maybe this is the best route.

Post #15 you are telling him there is no way round it, case closed he can't do anything, you're wrong.

Actually Page 7 of the Guide UKF (publishing.service.gov.uk) is important for you as it does state that your name on the birth certificate would be considered sufficient proof without the expensive requirement for DNA which is probably the bit that many people on here were referring to a a couple of years ago, as I said this UKF form did not exist when I had to go through this process.

Kevin I have read further UKF is for Charlene Jr, it is the route for children born prior to 1st of July 2006.

I still think MN1 is the correct route for Charlotte.

Capitalising words is considered shouting, I was.

Using bold text is perfectly normal as a means to draw attention to any point in written text however writing replies in the body of a quote is not. Highlighting parts of a quote and writing a reply outside the quote would be considered normal and you can quote the same text multiple times highlighting different parts each time.

Did you even read your link?

This is for those over age 18.

No I'm not read the clarifications in my other posts.

UKF is for children born before 1st July 2006 MN1 is for children born after 1st July 2006.

He has two kids born on either side of that boundary.

I had this specific argument with the British Consul in 2008 John, I'm right the law I quoted is right the child born after 1st July 2006 is automatically British but it requires to be proved and accepted.

My child went that route and we succeeded.

Quote it, where does your link say that.

"Yes I read it, it shows he can dismiss this area"

Say the above. In what way can he dismiss anything.

It is about naturalisation and applies to those over 18, it is not relevant to Kevin's situation at all.

Ah so he can dismiss your post that you made just a short while ago.

Ah very good the one that talks about the MN1.

When we have already had the MN1 guidance posted multiple times and disagreed with Guide_MN1-Jul19.pdf (publishing.service.gov.uk)