1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Uninsured drivers to get compo??

Discussion in 'Consumer Concerns' started by Aromulus, Jan 13, 2017.

  1. DJB
    Offline

    DJB Active Member

    S 2000 eh?

    Very nice :)
  2. oss
    Offline

    oss Tech Guy Staff Member

    Sadly she's long gone, I've posted a few pictures here of her over the years so I won't post another, I had the S from early 2004 to late 2008 fantastic car and if I had the money the only thing I would buy again but they are getting rare these days as there were only a limited number ever built.
  3. Methersgate
    Online

    Methersgate Well-Known Member Lifetime Member

    A magnet for Mr Plod...
  4. oss
    Offline

    oss Tech Guy Staff Member

    Technically yes :) but I enjoyed it in the mountains mostly not on the main highway :)
  5. DavidAlma
    Online

    DavidAlma Active Member

    There should be a thread for the favorite car you've ever owned. I for one miss my Jaguar EType. Craziest thing I ever did selling her.
  6. graham59
    Offline

    graham59 Well-Known Member

    I miss my Lotus Sevens. This is the second one I owned:

    1460252_10202738087193743_2144611631_n.jpg

    .
    • Like Like x 3
  7. Drunken Max
    Offline

    Drunken Max New Member

    I'm pretty sure the EU ruling is based on much of existing UK law / insurance and not the other way round. If an uninsured driver is hit and maimed by say an insured drunk driver then they, in my opinion, should be able to access compensation. they are guilty of a crime but not of the incident. They should also be charged wtih the offence of driving without insurance. Criminal compensation is paid out to many victims, whether the perpetrator is found or not or whether anyone has insurance or not under the CICA. This to me is an extension of that. All UK not EU law as far as I can tell and will not disappear after Brexit
    • Agree Agree x 2
  8. oss
    Offline

    oss Tech Guy Staff Member

    You have changed my thinking on this, 'they are guilty of a crime but not of the incident' I agree.

Share This Page