Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Consumer Concerns' started by Aromulus, Jan 13, 2017.
S 2000 eh?
Sadly she's long gone, I've posted a few pictures here of her over the years so I won't post another, I had the S from early 2004 to late 2008 fantastic car and if I had the money the only thing I would buy again but they are getting rare these days as there were only a limited number ever built.
A magnet for Mr Plod...
Technically yes but I enjoyed it in the mountains mostly not on the main highway
There should be a thread for the favorite car you've ever owned. I for one miss my Jaguar EType. Craziest thing I ever did selling her.
I miss my Lotus Sevens. This is the second one I owned:
I'm pretty sure the EU ruling is based on much of existing UK law / insurance and not the other way round. If an uninsured driver is hit and maimed by say an insured drunk driver then they, in my opinion, should be able to access compensation. they are guilty of a crime but not of the incident. They should also be charged wtih the offence of driving without insurance. Criminal compensation is paid out to many victims, whether the perpetrator is found or not or whether anyone has insurance or not under the CICA. This to me is an extension of that. All UK not EU law as far as I can tell and will not disappear after Brexit
You have changed my thinking on this, 'they are guilty of a crime but not of the incident' I agree.