Or Richard III, Edward II, Edward VIII, Mary, Charles I. Or Lincoln, FDR, Jefferson, Roosevelt, Wilson, Truman.
But only against very recent forum rules by an admin cowed by our resident troll Kuya the founder would have been without doubt been as revolted as I and presumably Oss is
Markham no doubt brought the Politics removal idea to the fore with one or two others. This was requested by “both sides”, those in the “middle” and even by those who dont partake in the said subject. It was voiced out and although removal wasnt granted, it does exist but is hidden. The forum dynamics have changed (better or worse ??) since it has been put “under the stairs” but some disagree, some say its taken far too long and should have been acted upon quicker, and those who dont really care. You are right Kuya may well have disagreed but the ethos of the forum still stands, we help others were we once stood. Im sure or hope he would have liked the fact that the forum exists performing the functions it does. Regards Oss I cannot speak for Jim but as you quite rightly say, its a presumption. Just like the rules in F1, they change and with it so do the dynamics. Sometimes changing makes thd sport better, sometimes processional. If anyone would like to be added to the politics forum then please ask admin.
Prince Harry is technically not employed but does receive monies from the Duchy of Cornwall and his late mother's trust fund - on all of which he pays tax, of course. I don't think there's any likelihood of him becoming a benefits claimant! Yes events require policing which we pay for but that policing is also to protect the public as well as the VIPs. Now that he's left the army after ten years' service, much of Harry's time is spent working for his charities, such as the Invictus Games and Sentebale and that raises the question "was his visit to Nottingham 'work'?". If the answer is "yes", then Meghan Markle was also 'working' that day and that of course would be in direct contravention of the terms of her Visa. It is certainly arguable that Meghan is either dangerously close to breaching the terms of her Visa or has actually done so. Harry is not a diplomat so can not claim diplomatic immunity - the last royal Prince who could was Prince Andrew but only during his tenure as a Trade Ambassador. He is, to an extent, protected by Sovereign immunity which, as he lives in a royal palace, makes it very difficult to execute a judicial process against him. But that's moot because it would be Meghan and not Harry against whom the Home Office would act with regards to any breaches of her Visa conditions. However the reality is that anyone who seriously challenges her about that is likely to feel a large measure of public opprobrium meted-out against them which could include electoral defeat.
I am sure he is, your churlish game going back to 2017 to rate posts just about confirms my opinion of yourself. your on ignore!
Wow.. That disgusting and stinking rat is still active?? Good choice on blocking it`s agenda and ridiculous world view with "ignore"!! Congrats.
