1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Traditional Britain Group

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion and Ethics' started by Kuya, Aug 9, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Kuya
    Offline

    Kuya The Geeky One Staff Member

    So after a little browsing online tonight I came across a right wing fringe group called “The Traditional Britain Group”, and by traditional we're talking Victorian. Amongst the views held and forwarded by this group is the assisted repatriation of non white people to their home countries!

    More interesting than this bunch of inbred toffs comes from the names associated with them. Names such as:

    Christopher Gill who is a UKIP politician and former Conservative MP.

    Jacob Rees-Mogg who is the Conservative MP for North East Somerset.

    They also had a stand at the UKIP national conference in Birmingham back in 2012 to try and get more supporters, spread their message and to basically make a few more buddies.

    So does anyone really think UKIP aren’t a bunch of fruitcakes?
  2. Anon220806
    Offline

    Anon220806 Well-Known Member

    Anyone but them to run the country. Whichever way you look at Godfrey Bloom, a closet racist or fruit cake ( and he is either one or the other ), he isn't fit to represent the UK in europe or at home.
  3. Methersgate
    Offline

    Methersgate Well-Known Member Lifetime Member

    Rees-Mogg (son of William Rees-Mogg the one time Editor of the Tmes I think) says that he is not a member and is shocked that they behave as they do - he gave a speech to them then found out what they are like. so he gets the benefit of the doubt from me.
  4. Kuya
    Offline

    Kuya The Geeky One Staff Member

    He had been warned by Searchlight before he did the talk and he dismissed them!
  5. Methersgate
    Offline

    Methersgate Well-Known Member Lifetime Member

    Benefit of doubt withdrawn, in that case!
  6. Anon220806
    Offline

    Anon220806 Well-Known Member

    The people who they represent obviously don't think so. But then they are in a small minority. Farage was quick to to try and mop up behind Bloom's blooper, indicating that he wants to capture votes from the public that might otherwise be horrified by Blooms remarks. Unfortunately for UKIP this incident has done them no favours as Bloom's intent is very obvious and further exacerbated by his schoolboy attempts to try and cover up for it.

    Apart from the small and limited minority of UKIP support, most people will vote for one of the other 3 parties (in England).
  7. Kuya
    Offline

    Kuya The Geeky One Staff Member

    I think we are seeing a fracturing of the British political system, parties being torn apart and new parties coming from the void. This could be a good thing, or a bad thing.. Though, I do think a few more parties who got more votes in this country would be a good thing.
  8. Markham
    Offline

    Markham Guest

    What is so very different between Godfrey Bloom's "Bongo Bongo land" reference and describing members of a political party as "inbred toffs" and "fruit cakes"? Labour Party supporters would, I'm sure, object to being referred to as "Lenin's Lackeys" just as the Greens would burst into tears if their message was cited as "the shrill utterings of bobble-hatted tree-huggers". (I'll leave the Lib-Dems alone on this occasion, they have more than enough problems as it is!)

    And tell me, what is so very different about offering paid repatriation to "non-whites" and this Home Secretary's immigration policy? Both are equally odious and target the same group of individuals.
  9. Anon220806
    Offline

    Anon220806 Well-Known Member

    No they aren't as equally odious. One is distinctly less odious than the other. There are clear differences in degree between them.
  10. Anon220806
    Offline

    Anon220806 Well-Known Member

    There is a difference. One is a group of comparitively disadvantaged peoples and the other is a group of people that are putting themselves up to govern the UK on a supposed professional footing and or represent the UK in Europe ie people that should know better than to use Bongo Bongo land as a "derogatory reference to Third World countries, particularly in Africa, or to a fictional such country".

    Godfrey Bloom has no excuses. If he can't be civil where the 3rd world is concerned, as a serious politician, then he ought to be out on his ear.

    Lets assume that Godfrey Bloom is not a senile buffoon. Then his choice of words were loaded with intent. Intent to incite.....
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2013
  11. Kuya
    Offline

    Kuya The Geeky One Staff Member

    It was the people who attended a bash in one of London’s oldest "Old boys" clubs that I called inbred. It was the lack of chins from their heads that made me think they were inbred, not their political views. Though, being of the view that none white people should leave Britain and be "assisted" in doing so makes this group a pretty nasty group. As a man with a none white wife, they are by their very nature my political enemy!

    UKIP are the ones I called fruitcakes and as they veer ever more away from logic and sound reasoning to conspiracy theories and far right hokum, I shall keep referring to them as fruitcakes (or perhaps scones)!

    But they do! The right wing media blame this countries immigration issues directly at Labour, in fact they blame every woe at the door of Labour and refer to mass immigration as Labours effort to amend the British voting public to be left wing (though lacking any facts on the matter). Left wing figures are always demonised and often attacked for things other than their views. Owen Jones is a good example of this!

    The current home secretary is odious and her policies (including the £18,600.00 rule) are pretty sly and I have never said anything nice about her due to her arrogance, incompetence and her lack of humanity. But paying people to go home is creeping ever so closer to the policies of Hitler and his cohorts and that sort of thing.
  12. Dave_E
    Offline

    Dave_E Well-Known Member Trusted Member

    These arguments are crackers.

    Have people nothing better to do than bullshit that Godfrey Bloom ever intended his "Bongo Bongo" statement to be evil and racist
    (which he obviously did not)
    whilst ignoring his underlying very good point that a lot of overseas aid is wasted funding affluent lifesytyles and pet projects for despot overseas dictators and corrupt regimes.


    What! we are wasting billions funding the Nigerian Space Program whilst we cannot afford to fund our own NHS.

    Oh Forget that Far more important that Godfrey used the work bongo which sounds vaguely African, so he must be a right wing racist thug. If he had more hair, a dodgey tache, and a tub of brylcream he would even LOOK like Hitler.

    Jeez...:)
  13. graham59
    Offline

    graham59 Banned

    Totally agree Dave.

    (Waits for the flames).
  14. Kuya
    Offline

    Kuya The Geeky One Staff Member

    Dave,

    People on the left and right of politics have expressed concern with the overseas aid programs we have ongoing right now. This never raises an eyebrow, because it is a genuine concern of a lot of people right now. However, the term "Bongo Bongo land" is a derogatory reference to Africa and sometimes Asia (though to be honest it is Africa). It is not a minor jokey remark from someone of a certain age. It is a tell tale sign that a person who says vote for me has potentially racist views.

    But the Traditional Britain Group go far beyond even that. These guys don't mince their words, they want to roll back the welfare state, repatriate none whites to their "homeland" and have links with some very nasty people (thugs and what not).
  15. Dave_E
    Offline

    Dave_E Well-Known Member Trusted Member

    So why does nobody even discuss that, why are people chasing ghosts of a non existent right wing jack booted ogre.
    The correct action would have been to agree with Godfrey.

    Everybody has jumped to the wrong conclusion here, Bongos are from South America /Cuba.

    I see no intended racism, why are people so sensitive these days.
    If he had used the term "Nigerian" he would most likely have been firebombed!

    1. Obviously the Welfare state does need to be far more efficient than it is now. At the moment it struggles to serve the public.
    2. Can you really see people marched en-mass onto boats in Southampton docks, no way.
    3. "Links with nasty people / thugs", you started off this thread talking about two respectable centre ground politicians. I always view the rogue left wing element as being the most violent. In fact see my comment about firebomb above.
  16. Januarius
    Offline

    Januarius Member

    "I see no intended racism, why are people so sensitive these days".

    And neither do I..
    That said,I don't count as I moved out of Britain and cannot vote as I went and moved to Bongo Bongo land!!
    Happy days!!
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2013
  17. Markham
    Offline

    Markham Guest

    I seem to recall that it was a Labour toff - Mandelson - who admitted that not only did his government relax the immigration rules it inherited but went far further by having an "open door" immigration policy. And I also recall that famous note left by the Labour Chief Secretary to the Treasury to his successor which amounted to "sorry, old boy, there is no cash!". So Britain's economic plight and immigration mess can be fairly levelled at that party. Not forgetting, of course, that it was that same Labour government which is responsible for authoring a very dodgy dossier about Saddam and Iraq and which led to war: that government has blood on its hands and if there was any justice in this world, Blair and his entire cabinet would be on trial for war crimes.
  18. Anon220806
    Offline

    Anon220806 Well-Known Member

    Some people are missing the point. It isn't the main message that Godfrey conveyed that is of concern. The point is how he made it. He tried to emphasise his point by using a derogatory, insensitive and unacceptable style. The fact that in amongst it he tried to make a valid political point has been lost. It has backfired on him and only UKIPS ardent core of followers believe he wasn't out of order.

    UKIP have made a bridgehead in British politics as they appeal to a certain profile of electorate. That type of electorate is quite a narrow one. To build on numbers they would have to bury their xenophobic tendencies, which is why Farage told him to zip it. However these boys have gone as far as they can possibly go on their existing manifesto.

    Any one in a Fil Brit relationship of any kind, that is seeking to bring their Filipino partner to the UK would be crazy to vote for UKIP. Same goes for those whose partners are already here and on FLR or ILR. Those who feel there is no need for concern because they have expatriated already or intend to, be careful what you wish for as you may wish to come back to the UK with your Filipino partner some time, if for any reason things don't work out overseas. Don't burn your bridges and vote UKIP or canvas on their behalf.

    Well done Godfrey.
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2013
  19. Anon220806
    Offline

    Anon220806 Well-Known Member

    So what exactly do you think was his intention? :D
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2013
  20. Markham
    Offline

    Markham Guest

    There's a double standard at play in the UK which I had previously suspected but was confirmed to me over a pint with a pal who'd just retired from the Police Service. A Caucasian who makes a remark likely to cause offence to a member of a minority group risks prosecution; the same is not true in the reverse situation.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page