1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Windows 10 reminder/app/Icon......... gone

Discussion in 'Technology Advice' started by Aromulus, Oct 20, 2015.

  1. Anon04576
    Offline

    Anon04576 Well-Known Member

    Ahh I missed Jim's post, apologies.
  2. Aromulus
    Offline

    Aromulus The Don Staff Member

    I didn't mean to ignore you yesterday evening, mate. I was trying to console the anak.
  3. Anon04576
    Offline

    Anon04576 Well-Known Member

    Ha no problem mate. As you could see our hands are pretty full at the moment, plenty of other times my friend.
  4. oss
    Offline

    oss Somewhere Staff Member

    Yeah it was derived from NextStep it's been highly customised for quite a while.

    The thing about the home users is that they have mostly largely realised that all they need is a tablet or a phone or a Chromebook or a Smart TV, the browsers of the world only need a 'Browser' UI and many of them are just doing that on a phablet phone these days, the home market is dying compared to what it once was.

    As for me I can't load Visual Studio on a Mac running Mac OS and I can't run Borland Delphi on Mac OS, I can't run SQL Server on Mac OS and I doubt I could run the latest version of Oracle either, I make my living with these tools in the Windows ecosystem. And as for personal use my hobby is photography and Apple apparently had a good native tool in Aperture which they then killed, so the choice would be Lightroom vs Lightroom for the Mac, everything else that I do with a computer works pretty well and very cheaply on my ThinkPad's running Windows.
  5. ChoiAndJohn
    Offline

    ChoiAndJohn Well-Known Member Trusted Member

    Yeah I agree about the home market - but that weakens the argument for an endlessly customizable PC further. If most users just want to use a browser, upload and tinker with a few movies and photos, then you can do the job equally on both operating systems and both hardware platforms.

    And in addition, since you can run windows on mac hardware, but you can't run OS X on a PC (unless you love tinkering and go down the hackintosh route - and tinkering is what I'm trying to avoid) then that makes the mac a totally viable choice. Plus you get a very good operating system thrown in that suffers from fewer viruses, tends to have fewer device problems (largely due to the OS being designed for the hardware and vice versa) and handles software installation and deinstallation more securely than windows does.

    There is no reason why you couldn't even dual boot a mac into either windows or OS-X. So, if you don't need the endless hardware customization options, there's really no need for a PC. You could use all the software that you mention on a mac running windows either natively or via a VM just fine. Incidentally you can run delphi and oracle natively on a mac. Clearly not studio which is tied into the Microsoft empire. You can even run a SQL server client on the mac if you for some perverse reason like SQL server. Personally I find PL/SQL in oracle far superior.

    I like photography too. On the mac I use aperture, lightroom, photoshop for photos and final cut pro & motion & Adobe after effects for video editing. What camera do you use?
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2015
  6. Micawber
    Offline

    Micawber Renowned Lifetime Member

    I know this thread's is in English because I can read it. But sadly I can't understand a word :D
  7. ChoiAndJohn
    Offline

    ChoiAndJohn Well-Known Member Trusted Member

    Laugh. To be honest you're not missing much. @oss is sitting on the 'PC' side of the fence. I, after many years on the 'PC' side of the fence, have moved over to the 'Mac' side of the fence. :)
  8. oss
    Offline

    oss Somewhere Staff Member

    Yeah but your Mac hardware is more expensive than your Windows hardware for comparative capabilities, peripherals are more fussy on the Mac.

    RAD Studio won't run natively on a Mac, but you can generate native applications written in Delphi's Object Pascal for the Mac, SQL Server is easier to manage than Oracle although I have to admit I've not spent a lot of time with Oracle recently, I too prefer Oracle simple things like named sequences which we finally only got in SqlServer 2012 and even then the implementation was not great, however Oracle really needs a DBA whereas you can go a long way with SqlServer without needing a specialist DBA. PL/SQL vs T-SQL well they are both capable languages, orthodoxy these days has it that stored procs are bad so many people don't use either but personally I disagree with the orthodoxy in this case and where appropriate SQL and it's procedural variants should be used in applications when they are the right tool for the job in hand.

    Canon 1Ds mk II is my main full frame, I have an old Canon 1D APS-H and a Canon 40D APS-C, I had a Canon 5D (first version) but it got drowned.

    We clearly won't convince each other either way, but personally I see no real reason to switch to a Mac, amongst other things I would never get used to the keyboards after a lifetime with 'Home' and 'End' keys :)
  9. ChoiAndJohn
    Offline

    ChoiAndJohn Well-Known Member Trusted Member

    very nice. I use a 5d mark 3 and a 7d. You don't have to convince me about pc - after all I've had enough experience in them - but I'm not sure I want to go back. As for keyboards, any pc keyboard will work on a Mac. Whilst it's true that some peripherals are a bit funny, what do you really need when it comes down to it? Printers, camera, scanner and like seem fine. Plus the mac pro uses thunderbolt storage and the Internal drive gives a speed of almost 1gb a second. For video editing the mac pro is brilliant. Extremely fast. I use a workstation with 8 physical cores and 64gb of ram with 1tb flash and dual d7000 opengl cards. To spec up an equivalent windows pc would actually have cost more. I saw an article about that somewhere let me find it.
  10. Aromulus
    Offline

    Aromulus The Don Staff Member

    What have I unleashed...............????????????????????????????????????
  11. oss
    Offline

    oss Somewhere Staff Member

    I've thought about a 7D mk II to replace the old 1D, more reach and as good an autofocus system, the 1D original despite being over 14 years old still has a frighteningly good autofocus system and it has a CCD sensor rather than CMOS which makes for interesting features like 1/500th flash sync and 1/16000th of a second fastest shutter speed.

    Only 4 megapixel the old 1D but I still love it

    My son in 2008
    [​IMG]

    And mummy
    [​IMG]
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2015
  12. oss
    Offline

    oss Somewhere Staff Member

    Yeah sorry Dom, drifty drifty :D
  13. Aromulus
    Offline

    Aromulus The Don Staff Member

    A nice looking kid on a bad hair day............
    • Funny Funny x 1
  14. oss
    Offline

    oss Somewhere Staff Member

    James was only 2 years and 10 months when that was taken, he still has spiky hair :D
  15. ChoiAndJohn
    Offline

    ChoiAndJohn Well-Known Member Trusted Member

  16. oss
    Offline

    oss Somewhere Staff Member

    The Cyan cast is a feature of the 1D CCD sensor and it's one that I quite like :) plus our walls really are that colour so that tends to accentuate it.

    They will have been processed slightly in Lightroom many many years ago but I can't remember the settings without going and looking them up, I check later.

    Reason for posting was simply to illustrate what you could get out of a 14 year old 4 megapixel CCD sensor on the top of the range Canon at the time.

    There is a pilot on dpreview who has been shooting (photographing :)) American fighter jets for many years using the original Canon 1D he gets some fantastic results, of course with the lack of pixels your framing has to be good to start with as you're not going to be able to crop much.
  17. oss
    Offline

    oss Somewhere Staff Member

    Checked the shots, the second one had no processing at all apart from the update to the 2010 process (ACR profile).

    The one of James was only cropped and updated to the 2010 process.

    They were an accurate rendering of the lighting conditions at the time so I didn't mess with them.
    Last edited: Oct 22, 2015
  18. ChoiAndJohn
    Offline

    ChoiAndJohn Well-Known Member Trusted Member

    I see. I wondered about the coloration. Of course, you and I know that pixel counts aren't really so important and what counts is the size of the pixels and the quality of the lens. What lens did you use? My favorite go-to lens is my trusty canon 24-70 F2.8 L. I use that lens more than any other.
  19. oss
    Offline

    oss Somewhere Staff Member

    I'd have to check again and the Lighroom catalogs are back in the office at the moment, at that time it would likely have been either the 24-105 f4 L or the 50mm f1.4, ah just checked on Flickr the shot of James was taken on the old 50mm f1.4 which is not a bad portrait lens on APS-H and the one of Ana was on the 24-105 L.

    She delivered my daughter 11 hours after that photo was taken, and I mean delivered, we were on our way to the cinema via a quick stop at Tokyo-Tokyo 9 hours after that picture was taken, just as the food arrived she decided it was time to go to the hospital that was about an hour before she delivered Janna :D (oh and we had to have the food converted to a takeaway no leaving it behind :)) .

    My 24-105 got drowned as well and I have been using the 24-70 f2.8 L since 2011, I do miss the 24-105 though it was very versatile and not far behind the 24-70 in quality, still thinking about getting a new one as it does not look like Canon are going to replace that lens soon.
  20. KeithAngel
    Offline

    KeithAngel 2063 Lifetime Member

    on another note changed to fiber today

    [​IMG]

Share This Page